data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f4b0/8f4b0213384fb56f7d3693802ae5110fd5c28ceb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a6f6/7a6f6c3e08ee064420803ebc9082239d6c0b85aa" alt=""
I'm heading to Alaska this fall and plan to hunt Sitka Black Tail deer and Black bear. I need to purchase a new rifle that can knock down a bear and perform well at long range but doesn't pose a significant issue as far as recoil. The recoil on a .300 Weatherby is significant, but not out of line. It wouldn't be a great rifle to sit and shoot at ground hogs all day, but taking a couple of shots while hunting big game would be no problem. Comparing it to the .300 WSM, it is greater. The recoil on a .300 WSM is similar to that of a .30-06. So, remember it will shoot harder, but not out of line. As for benefits of both, the .300 WSM was designed to compete with the .300 Win Mag without the recoil, nor the use of a long magnum action. Recoil wise, it will save my shoulder a bit. It is also known to be very accurate and available in lighter weight rifles. On the other hand, it doesn't handle the larger weight bullets as well as the full length cartridges. So, although it has great benefits in the popular bullet weights, its is limited when trying to expand it into 180 grain and larger bullets. Does anyone have any advice for me?